Why the Healthcare Staffing System Is Broken — And What Needs to Change


The MSP Model Needs Rethinking

Many staffing program promise neutrality – but are built for control, not collaboration.


Eric Christenson, IntegriFlex Advisors

Too many solutions prioritize control over collaboration, creating friction across stakeholders. “Workforce Solutions” should encompass all categories of work and a comprehensive strategy that includes core recruitment, scheduling and optimization of internal and local resources.

Tools exist, but they’re rarely integrated across sourcing, credentialing, scheduling, and performance. Visibility is fragmented. Reporting is reactive.

Rural health systems, long-term care, outpatient clinics, and home health are often unsupported by large MSPs focused exclusively on acute care.

Between MSP fees, platform markups, GPO fees, and hidden ‘rebates,’ few leaders know what they’re actually paying — or why.

Vendors describe many programs as “black holes” — with limited communication, inconsistent feedback, and no voice at the table.

As we observed during Covid, lack of diversification creates long-term risk leading to not fill jobs when you need them or paying more than you should.

The workforce system is structured for transactions — not transformation.

Eric Christenson, IntegriFlex Advisors

This isn’t a software problem. It’s a strategy problem.

  1. Design programs that are fit-for-purpose, not one-size-fits-all
  2. Rethink how we define success — beyond fill rates and cost-per-shift
  3. Bring suppliers and systems together through transparency, not tiers
  4. Align tools with strategy — not just transactions
  5. Understand that workforce strategy is no longer HR’s job alone — it’s a C-suite imperative

Leave a Reply

Discover more from IntegriFlex Advisors

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading